The tension between demand for high-quality, ubiquitous cell phone service and opposition to cell towers in residential neighborhoods has resulted in significant disputes between wireless carriers and municipalities over siting of such towers. Typically, the fight begins and ends at a city council. Recently, however, one such dispute resulted in a U.S. Supreme Court decision, T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell, Georgia, No. 13-975, Jan. 14, 2015, which delved into procedural issues associated with denial of proposed cell towers and provided guidance to municipalities as to how and when such denials must be explained.
T-Mobile proposed to construct a cell tower (disguised as a 108-foot tall pine tree, as required by local ordinance) on a vacant residential property. As is often the case, there was substantial neighborhood opposition to the new tower based on concerns that it was not needed, that the technology was outdated, and that it was aesthetically incompatible with the neighborhood. The application was discussed at a public meeting and ultimately rejected by the City Council. After the meeting, the City sent a notice of the denial to T-Mobile but without any written explanation. Minutes of the Council meeting were published 26 days later, shortly before the deadline to file suit challenging the denial.
Approval or rejection of cell phone towers is addressed in the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. In that Act, Congress delegated to the local governments the power to consider cell tower applications and required that a denial of an application “be in writing and supported by substantial evidence contained in a written record.” T-Mobile argued that the denial, while in writing, did not contain any explanation and, as such, could not be supported by substantial evidence. The City argued that T-Mobile representatives were present at the public meeting and thus knew the reasons. On top of that, they claimed, the release of the meeting minutes 26 days later (and four days before a petition for judicial review was due) satisfied the Act’s requirement of a written explanation. The Eleventh Circuit upheld Roswell’s denial, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a conflict between the circuits.
Continue Reading U.S. Supreme Court Tells Cities to Explain a Cell Tower Denial in Timely Fashion, Even if in a Separate Document